Practitech Opinion

Practitech Opinion

In these unstable times—marked by wars and economic uncertainty driven by unpredictable world leaders—environmental agreements are often pushed aside.

At the time of writing, COP30 has finished, with participants struggling to achieve even minimal results. The United States is absent, and once again, serious financial support for the poorest countries most affected by climate change seems unlikely.

Meanwhile, oil and gas are being promoted as viable energy sources. The urgency of 350 PPM and a 1.5 or 2.0°C global temperature rise limit appears forgotten, while economic priorities in wealthier nations dominate the agenda.

Of course, a cleaner environment alone does not guarantee happiness if people cannot afford food or housing. Yet perhaps we could reduce global polarization and strive for balance: ensuring a good life today while preserving a livable planet for our children and grandchildren.

Technological progress in recent decades has been remarkable. In my view, it is sufficient to mitigate many of the negative effects of inevitable climate change and to prepare solutions for the challenges ahead—if we are willing to support the companies developing them at private, institutional, and governmental levels.

It is too easy to leave responsibility solely to Big Tech and oil and gas giants. While they must play a role, they also have their own corporate priorities. Supporting new cleantech developments, however, can be both financially rewarding and socially beneficial—creating jobs, easing daily life, and driving innovation. And a great ROI for the right choices!

Examples of Companies We Support

ENG8 International, click Information ENG8 International.

• Clean, cold nuclear fusion technology, independently validated and available much sooner than hot fusion.
• Small, “On the Spot” installations will help sorting the ed problems worldwide. Including developing countries.
• First commercial pilot planned for early 2026.
• While oil and gas will remain necessary for some time (especially for non-energy products), decentralized, non-polluting, and cost-effective alternatives are essential—particularly for developing countries.
• Cooperation, rather than anti-lobbying, would accelerate global market adoption, speed-up commercial use and deliver strong ROI while providing much cheaper safe and clean energy.

Pyrolysise Ltd. – GreenMine Project (EIS), click Information Pyrolysise Ltd. GreenMine project.

• Using patented Waste Carbonisation Plant (WCP) technology, Pyrolysise addresses the global landfill crisis.
• Landfills, often near urban areas, pollute air and soil with methane and harmful odors and waste. They must be eliminated and prevented.
• GreenMine is ready to recycle existing waste and landfills, converting the remainder into clean energy with no pollution—using only 10% of its own generated energy.
• Creates clean building sites while recovering valuable materials profitably.

EnviraBoard Ltd. (EIS), click Information EnviraBoard.

• Transforms secondary paper waste (paper sludge) into carbon-negative building boards.
• Replaces outdated gypsum boards with a modern alternative: highly fire-resistant, strong (supports 30kg on a single screw), acoustically superior, flexible, cost-effective, and carbon-negative.
• Modernizes the construction industry while improving safety and comfort.
• Offers a strong return on investment within 4–5 years.

Why These Companies Matter

• All have moved beyond the early startup stage.
• Each address urgent environmental challenges without sacrificing comfort or affordability.
• They offer above-average returns for both short- and long-term investors—without the risks of speculative assets like cryptocurrency.

Sustainability and profitability can go hand in hand—with the right support.

A Note for Investors

Although these companies have been thoroughly vetted, developed excellent technologies, and receive strong backing, they face a common challenge: raising sufficient funds to bring their products to market.

Once institutional investors and family offices engage, funding becomes less of an issue. But reaching that stage requires individual investors who believe in their mission. In return, early investors can achieve way above-average returns within 3–4 years, often enhanced by government EIS tax relief: The benefits of EIS tax relief.docx.

If you believe in these companies, want to contribute to a better world, and seek strong returns from your cleantech portfolio, feel free to contact me for free information on how to invest.

And, of course, I am always happy with feedback and suggestions.

Best regards,

Paul Dopierala.